Project Rubric Grade 5

  • CriteriaGrading Scale
    Content

    The content of the movie addresses the subject matter and is accurate.

    4

    Excellent Insightful knowledge of topic. Evidence of thorough research using multiple sources. No informational errors or glaring omissions.

    3

    Good Accurate knowledge and understanding of topic. Evidence of adequate research using several sources. No major errors or omissions.

    2

    Satisfactory Adequate understanding and knowledge of topic. Some evidence of research with limited number of sources. Most information correct but some inaccuracies.

    1

    Needs Improvement Poor knowledge of topic. Contains few facts. Little evidence of research. Information may be copied from a single source. Major informational errors and omissions.

    Organization and Development of Viewpoint

    The sequence of the project makes sense, the theme matches the mood and topic.

    4

    Excellent Excellent development and organization of ideas and information. Point of view supported by quality details and examples.

    3

    Good Good development of ideas and information. Point of view supported by ample examples and details.

    2

    Satisfactory Adequate development and partial organization of ideas. Point of view supported by some examples and details.

    1

    Needs Improvement Minimal addressing of topic. Point of view supported by very few details and examples. Organization lacking.

    Craftsmanship and Presentation

    The photos and writing are correct and good quality

    4

    Excellent Creative and original work. Excellent selection and use of materials. Constructed with great care. Neatness exceptional. Excellent presentation. Communicates effectively with audience.

    3

    Good Original and attractive work. Good selection and use of materials. Constructed with care and is neat. Good presentation. Some awareness of audience. Voice projections and pacing sufficient.

    2

    Satisfactory Somewhat attractive project. Adequate selection and use of materials. Constructed with minimal care. Somewhat neat. Fair presentation. Some awareness of audience. Voice too loud or soft.

    1

    Needs Improvement Not particularly interesting or attractive project. Poor selection and use of materials. Constructed carelessly. Poor delivery and organization of presentation. Unable to answer most questions.

    Conventions

    4

    Excellent Consistently uses correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, and varied sentence structure.

    3

    Good Contains few errors in mechanics. Good use of varied sentence structure.

    2

    Satisfactory Contains several errors in mechanics. Some varied sentence structure.

    1

    Needs Improvement Contains many major errors in mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning. Little variation in sentence structure.

    Group Panel

    The group supported their movie in the introduction and in the question and answer session.

    4

    Excellent The group introduced their movie and explained their process well, and answered the audience's questions clearly and completely

    3

    Good The introduction was good, and most of the audience questions were answered, but a couple things were unclear or not presented as well as possible.

    2

    Satisfactory The introduction was ok, and most of the audience's questions were answered well. Some answers were unclear or the introduction weren't as well thought out as could have been.

    1

    Needs Improvement The introduction was not well done or thought out, answers to the audiences questions were unclear or didn't answer the questions

    Total pts: 20