|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insightful knowledge of topic. Evidence of thorough research using
multiple sources. No informational errors or glaring omissions. 9-11
images used in movie.
|
Accurate knowledge and understanding of topic. Evidence of adequate
research using several sources. No major errors or omissions. 7-8 images
used in movie.
|
Adequate understanding and knowledge of topic. Some evidence of
research with limited number of sources. Most information correct but
some inaccuracies. 4-6 images used in movie.
|
Poor knowledge of topic. Contains few facts. Little evidence of
research. Information may be copied from a single source. Major
informational errors and omissions. Less than 4 images used in movie.
|
|
|
Excellent development and organization of ideas and information. Point of view supported by quality details and examples.
|
Good development of ideas and information. Point of view supported by ample examples and details.
|
Adequate development and partial organization of ideas. Point of view supported by some examples and details.
|
Minimal addressing of topic. Point of view supported by very few details and examples. Organization lacking.
|
|
|
Creative and original work. Excellent selection and use of materials.
Constructed with great care. Neatness exceptional. Excellent
presentation. Communicates effectively with audience.
|
Original and attractive work. Good selection and use of materials.
Constructed with care and is neat. Good presentation. Some awareness of
audience. Voice projections and pacing sufficient.
|
Somewhat attractive project. Adequate selection and use of materials.
Constructed with minimal care. Somewhat neat. Fair presentation. Some
awareness of audience. Voice too loud or soft.
|
Not particularly interesting or attractive project. Poor selection
and use of materials. Constructed carelessly. Poor delivery and
organization of presentation. Unable to answer most questions.
|
|
|
Consistently uses correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, and varied sentence structure.
|
Contains few errors in mechanics. Good use of varied sentence structure.
|
Contains several errors in mechanics. Some varied sentence structure.
|
Contains many major errors in mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning. Little variation in sentence structure.
|
|
|
All team members contributed to the project
|
Most of the team members contributed to the project.
|
Some of the team members contributed to the project.
|
Less than half of the team members contributed to the project.
|
|
|
Worked cooperatively as a group most of time but had a few problems that the team resolved themselves.
|
Worked cooperatively as a group most of the time, but had one problem that required adult intervention.
|
Worked cooperatively as a group some of the time, but had several problems that required adult intervention.
|
Did not work cooperatively without direct adult intervention.
|
|
|
Consistently listens to and follows oral directions and explanations. Project assembled properly and correctly.
|
Listens and follows directions most of the time. Project assembled properly.
|
Listens and follows directions some of the time. Project assembled somewhat properly.
|
Pays little attention to directions. Project not well assembled
|
