| | | | | |
| |
Insightful knowledge of topic. Evidence of thorough research using
multiple sources. No informational errors or glaring omissions. 9-11
images used in movie. |
Accurate knowledge and understanding of topic. Evidence of adequate
research using several sources. No major errors or omissions. 7-8
images used in movie. |
Adequate understanding and knowledge of topic. Some evidence of
research with limited number of sources. Most information correct but
some inaccuracies. 4-6 images used in movie. |
Poor knowledge of topic. Contains few facts. Little evidence of
research. Information may be copied from a single source. Major
informational errors and omissions. Less than 4 images used in movie.
|
| |
Excellent development and organization of ideas and information.
Point of view supported by quality details and examples. | Good development of ideas and information. Point of view supported by ample examples and details. | Adequate development and partial organization of ideas. Point of view supported by some examples and details. | Minimal addressing of topic. Point of view supported by very few details and examples. Organization lacking. |
| |
Creative and original work. Excellent selection and use of
materials. Constructed with great care. Neatness exceptional.
Excellent presentation. Communicates effectively with audience. |
Original and attractive work. Good selection and use of materials.
Constructed with care and is neat. Good presentation. Some awareness
of audience. Voice projections and pacing sufficient. |
Somewhat attractive project. Adequate selection and use of
materials. Constructed with minimal care. Somewhat neat. Fair
presentation. Some awareness of audience. Voice too loud or soft.
|
Not particularly interesting or attractive project. Poor selection
and use of materials. Constructed carelessly. Poor delivery and
organization of presentation. Unable to answer most questions. |
| | Consistently uses correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, and varied sentence structure. | Contains few errors in mechanics. Good use of varied sentence structure. | Contains several errors in mechanics. Some varied sentence structure. | Contains many major errors in mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning. Little variation in sentence structure. |
| | All team members contributed to the project | Most of the team members contributed to the project. | Some of the team members contributed to the project. | Less than half of the team members contributed to the project. |
| | Worked cooperatively as a group most of time but had a few problems that the team resolved themselves. | Worked cooperatively as a group most of the time, but had one problem that required adult intervention. | Worked cooperatively as a group some of the time, but had several problems that required adult intervention. | Did not work cooperatively without direct adult intervention. |
| | Consistently listens to and follows oral directions and explanations. Project assembled properly and correctly. | Listens and follows directions most of the time. Project assembled properly. | Listens and follows directions some of the time. Project assembled somewhat properly. | Pays little attention to directions. Project not well assembled |
